Author Instructions

This page provides instructions for authors submitting papers to any of the tracks of ACM Multimedia 2026. Please carefully read the following guidelines before submitting your paper.

Scope

Topics

The topics of interest of ACM Multimedia 2026 include (see the Topics of Interest for full description):

Multimedia/multimodality Policy for Paper Submissions

As the volume of submissions to the MM conference continues to grow annually, the SIGMM community seeks to distinguish itself from other communities such as NeurIPS, CVPR, and ECCV. Our focus lies in promoting research that is inherently multimedia or multimodal in nature. While papers that involve unimedia/unimodal processing will not necessarily be rejected, papers that make multimedia/multimodal research contributions will be preferred for publication in the conference proceedings. Out-of-scope submissions may be desk-rejected.

Submission Deadlines, Format, and Platform

Deadlines

The deadlines are different for each track, please be sure to check the specific call for papers for each track to find the important dates for each track.

OpenReview Platform

Submit your contributions via OpenReview. Please check the specific call for papers to find the submission link for each track.

All listed authors must have an up-to-date OpenReview profile. It is important to create it as soon as possible, given OpenReview's moderation policy for newly created profiles:

The OpenReview profile will be used to handle conflicts of interest and paper matching. To be considered complete, each author profile must be properly attributed with the following mandatory fields: current and past institutional affiliation (going back at least 5 years), homepage, DBLP (if there is prior publication), ORCID, Advisors and Recent Publications (if any). In addition, other fields such as Google Scholar, LinkedIn, Semantic Scholar, Advisees and Other Relations should be entered wherever applicable. An incomplete OpenReview profile of any co-author is sufficient ground for a desk rejection.

Paper Format

Desk rejection Crteria

In addition to the criteria below, specific tracks might have additional desk rejection criteria. For instance, the main track has four additional desk-rejection criteria (see the call for technical papers).
Item Description
Incomplete submission Submission has no PDF, or broken PDF.
Bad formatting/ template Wrong template, over length or under length (more than a few lines).
Bad metadata format The title, abstract or author names have characters that are not alphanumeric or basic punctuation. Letters can have accents. Graphic characters such as emojis are not allowed. Latex code is not allowed either.
Out of scope Clear out of scope regarding the themes and subjects.
ACM code of conduct The authors breached ACM code of conduct and policies. (https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/plagiarism-overview; https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics)
Dual submission In between the Submission Deadline of the ACM Multimedia track and the associated official notification, the submitted contributions cannot be under-review or with pending decisions at other venues. This extends also to dual submissions to ACM Multimedia, even to different tracks of ACM Multimedia. Contributions identified as dual submissions will be desk-rejected.
Plagiarism Submissions that are substantially similar to published articles will be desk rejected. Technical reports versions of the paper (university or arxiv reports), are not considered plagiarism (see ArXiV/Archive Policy below).

ArXiv/Archive Policy

In accordance with ACM guidelines, all SIGMM-sponsored conferences adhere to the following policy regarding arXiv papers:

We define a publication as a written piece documenting scientific work that was submitted for review by peers for either acceptance or rejection, and, after review, has been accepted. Documentation of scientific work that is published in a not-for-profit archive without any form of peer-review (departmental Technical Report, arXiv.org, etc.) is not considered a publication. However, this definition of publication does include peer-reviewed workshop papers, even if they do not appear in formal proceedings. Any submission to ACM Multimedia must not have substantial overlap with prior publications or other work currently undergoing peer review anywhere. Note that documents published on website archives are subject to change. Citing such documents is discouraged. Furthermore, ACM Multimedia will review the documents formally submitted and any additional information in a web archive version will not affect the review.

Contribution Length by Track

Track Name Paper Length
Main Technical Program Up to 8 pages + 2 additional pages for references
Brave New Ideas Up to 8 pages + 2 additional pages for references
Workshop (long papers) Up to 8 pages + 2 additional pages for references
Workshop (short papers) Up to 4 pages + 2 additional pages for references
Doctoral Symposium Up to 4 pages + 2 additional pages for references
Reproducibility Companion Up to 4 pages + 2 additional pages for references
Workshop (summary) Up to 4 pages + 2 additional pages for references
Grand Challenge (summary) Up to 4 pages + 2 additional pages for references
Open Source Competition Up to 4 pages + 2 additional pages for references
(Include link to & zip with software)
Dataset Papers Up to 6 pages + 2 additional pages for references
Grand Challenge (papers) Up to 6 pages + 2 additional pages for references
(Only for the top-3 performing teams)
Abstract Up to 6 pages + 2 additional pages for references
Demo and Video Competition 2 pages

Blinding

All tracks of ACM Multimedia (except the Reproducibility and the Dataset Tracks) request contributions to conform with the “double-blind” review policy. This means that the authors will not know the names of the reviewers of their papers, and reviewers will not know the names of the authors. Please prepare your paper in a way that preserves anonymity of the authors. Papers without appropriate blinding will be desk-rejected without review. For example, when preparing your manuscript:

For reviewer assignment, the technical program chairs may employ local LLM instances or similar technologies to process your submissions. No information will be shared with third parties.

Originality

Papers submitted to ACM Multimedia must be the original work of the authors. They may not be simultaneously under review elsewhere (conference or journal). Publications that have been peer-reviewed and have appeared at other conferences or workshops may not be submitted to ACM Multimedia (see also the arXiv/Archive policy below). Authors should be aware that ACM has a strict policy with regard to plagiarism and self-plagiarism (https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/plagiarism). The authors' prior work must be cited appropriately.

Author List

Please ensure that you submit your papers with the full and final list of authors in the correct order. The author list registered for each submission is not allowed to change in any way after the abstract submission deadline. Note that this rule regards the identity of authors, but typos can be fixed.

Paper Title

As per MM Policy, paper titles should remain the same between submission and the camera-ready version. Changing the title and abstract of a submission is possible until the final regular paper deadline, although it is advised against making substantial changes.

Proofreading

Please proofread your submission carefully. It is essential that the language used in the paper is clear and correct so that it is easily understandable. (Either US English or UK English spelling conventions are acceptable.)